SLAPP stands for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation. These lawsuits are not primarily intended to win on the merits of the case, but rather to intimidate, silence, or exhaust critics through lengthy and expensive legal proceedings. Around the world, SLAPPs are increasingly being used against journalists, researchers, NGOs, and independent bloggers who report on matters of public interest.

As someone who has been writing about environmental and industry-related topics for many years, I believe that open discussion, transparency, and access to information are essential in a democratic society. When powerful actors use legal pressure to discourage criticism or scrutiny, it raises important questions that go far beyond a single case.

This blog has three goals:

  1. Document the case – to provide factual updates about the lawsuit and the broader context surrounding it.
  2. Collect resources – including articles, research, legal developments, and examples of other SLAPP cases around the world.
  3. Support public discussion – about freedom of expression, public participation, and the role of litigation in shaping that space.

This is not only about one lawsuit. It is about a broader issue: whether individuals and independent voices can continue to speak openly about matters of public interest without facing disproportionate legal pressure.

If you are a journalist, researcher, activist, or reader interested in SLAPP cases and freedom of expression, I hope this blog can serve as a useful resource.

More updates and documentation will follow.